Applying a Categorical Imperative

Project Id:

1113272

Essay Writing Service Ready to Help Online 24/7
Hire a professional essay writer at $13.40 per page and get qualified and unique paper help. Use our essay services and save more time for yourself.
Plagiarism free papers
Order Now

Posted By:

dj3545

Project Title:

Applying a Categorical Imperative

Writing Type:

Original

Project Type:

Gold

Status:

IN PROGRESS

Subject:

Philosophy

Number Of Pages:

2     1.5 spaced (674 words)

Number Of Sources:

1

Type of Document:

online discussion question

Academic Level:

College/University

Citation Style:

APA

Attachment(s):

N/A

Solution Files(s):

N/A

Description:

Part 1: Kant’s text and the textbook discuss two “formulations” or ways of expressing Kant’s Categorical Imperative, the “Formula of Universal Law” and the “Formula of Humanity.” For each formula, Kant considers four test cases to explain how it applies: Suicide, False Promises, Cultivating One’s Talents, and Beneficence. 1. Engage with the text: Choose one of these test cases (it can be from either formula), and explain in your own words the reasoning that leads to the conclusion Kant defends. You should first explain the Categorical Imperative itself, focusing on the particular formula you are considering, and then carefully show how that principle leads to a particular conclusion. 2. Reflect on the theories: Would a utilitarian come to a different conclusion? If so, explain why. If a utilitarian would come to the same conclusion in this case, could there be a variation in the case that would lead the utilitarian and Kant to come to different conclusions? 3. Reflect on yourself: Do you agree with Kant’s conclusion? If not, explain the flaws in his reasoning. If you do agree, and you think a utilitarian would come to a different conclusion in this or a slightly varied case, why do you think that Kant’s reasoning is superior to the utilitarian’s? (You may want to consult section 4.3, “Challenges to Kant’s Theory” for help with this section). Part 2: This week, we will consider how deontology applies to Discrimination vs. Religious Freedom: The Wedding Cake Baker. Please read the following two articles: George, R. and Girgis, S. (2017, Dec. 4). A baker’s first amendment rights. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/04/opinion/first-amendment-wedding-cake.html?_r=0 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Corvino, J. (2017, Nov. 27). Drawing a line in the ‘gay wedding cake’ case. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/27/opinion/gay-wedding-cake.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.? Then apply the Categorical Imperative (either version) while exploring the ethics of the issue.

Don’t waste time

Get a verified expert to help you with your assignment

Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

$28.80 for a 2-page paper

Let us cover any of your writing needs!

We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code “welcome15” for a 15% Discount!

Order Over WhatsApp Place an Order Online